About
Top Social Law Firms is a free online success tracking service specifically for law firms all over the world.
You can use the service to track your firm's social influence score as measured by Klout, updated once a week.
Why? So that you can see if you are improving your influence on social media then you are demonstrating your readiness for law in the digital 21st century.
Log In
By logging in you'll see your personal dashboard tracking your score over the past year.
Leaderboard
You can also see a "leaderboard" to see who are the the other leaders in your community.
Join
"Join" the list (link on the leaderboard page) with your Twitter account. If you are a bona fide law firm, you will be included in the list and your score will be published in the next release.
Follow
"Follow" the leaderboard (link on the leaderboard page) to receive an email update every time the board releases with new results (weekly)
This Rise board lists Law Firms from all around the world that have a presence on Twitter and ranks them on their social media influence.
We use Klout scores as a measure of social media influence.
The board will update weekly on Thursdays.
Click on "Join" if you wish to be included in the list and "Follow" if you wish to get a weekly update on how the firms score every week, the risers and fallers and relevant news about the community.
| Rank | Law Firm | Total Score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 201. | (204) |
|
Cripps | 47.0 |
| 202. | (202) |
|
Buchanan | 46.9 |
| 203. | (201) |
|
Troutman Sanders | 46.9 |
| 204. | (190) |
|
Angela Wang & Co | 46.9 |
| 205. | (208) |
|
Lowenstein Sandler | 46.9 |
| 206. | (206) |
|
Dorsey & Whitney | 46.9 |
| 207. | (212) |
|
Stephenson Harwood | 46.9 |
| 208. | (196) |
|
MMS | 46.8 |
| 209. | (213) |
|
DMH Stallard | 46.8 |
| 210. | (214) |
|
Gide Loyrette Nouel | 46.7 |
| 211. | (215) |
|
DLA Piper Canada | 46.7 |
| 212. | (242) |
|
LaPolt Law | 46.7 |
| 213. | (218) |
|
Debevoise & Plimpton | 46.7 |
| 214. | (205) |
|
Farrer & Co | 46.7 |
| 215. | (219) |
|
Law Firm Marketing | 46.7 |
| 216. | (211) |
|
Arent Fox LLP | 46.6 |
| 217. | (254) |
|
WINSTEAD PC | 46.6 |
| 218. | (237) |
|
Winckworth Sherwood | 46.4 |
| 219. | (207) |
|
Waller | 46.4 |
| 220. | (222) |
|
Gillespie Macandrew | 46.3 |
| 221. | (221) |
|
Jaburg|Wilk | 46.3 |
| 222. | (217) |
|
Knobbe Martens | 46.3 |
| 223. | (216) |
|
Balfour+Manson LLP | 46.2 |
| 224. | (232) |
|
Morisons Solicitors | 46.2 |
| 225. | (239) |
|
Butler Snow LLP | 46.2 |
| 226. | (235) |
|
Travers Smith | 46.2 |
| 227. | (209) |
|
Benesch Law | 46.2 |
| 228. | (223) |
|
Davies | 46.2 |
| 229. | (225) |
|
Jackson Walker | 46.1 |
| 230. | (220) |
|
Loeb & Loeb LLP | 46.1 |
| 231. | (226) |
|
Sullivan & Worcester | 46.0 |
| 232. | (224) |
|
Goulston & Storrs | 45.9 |
| 233. | (236) |
|
Federal Contracting | 45.9 |
| 234. | (227) |
|
Turcan Connell | 45.8 |
| 235. | (231) |
|
Stevens & Bolton | 45.8 |
| 236. | (261) |
|
Kelley Drye & Warren | 45.8 |
| 237. | (233) |
|
Carlton Fields | 45.7 |
| 238. | (249) |
|
GrayRobinson, P.a. | 45.7 |
| 239. | (238) |
|
Hinshaw & Culbertson | 45.6 |
| 240. | (234) |
|
NMM | 45.6 |
| 241. | (228) |
|
Vedder Price | 45.6 |
| 242. | (262) |
|
DLA Piper Australia | 45.5 |
| 243. | (245) |
|
Langleys Solicitors | 45.4 |
| 244. | (240) |
|
Dickinson Wright | 45.3 |
| 245. | (289) |
|
Fenwick Elliott LLP | 45.3 |
| 246. | (241) |
|
DavisPolkReg | 45.3 |
| 247. | (229) |
|
Deborah McMurray | 45.3 |
| 248. | (281) |
|
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind | 45.2 |
| 249. | (246) |
|
Snell & Wilmer | 45.2 |
| 250. | (230) |
|
Dinsmore & Shohl | 45.1 |
| 251. | (256) |
|
Forsters LLP | 45.1 |
| 252. | (257) |
|
Gardere Wynne Sewell | 45.0 |
| 253. | (279) |
|
StewartsLawLLP | 45.0 |
| 254. | (243) |
|
Brownstein Hyatt | 44.9 |
| 255. | (244) |
|
Gibbons P.C. | 44.9 |
| 256. | (251) |
|
Cadwalader | 44.7 |
| 257. | (253) |
|
Schnader Harrison | 44.6 |
| 258. | (248) |
|
GreenwoodsSolicitors | 44.6 |
| 259. | (259) |
|
McDonald Hopkins LLC | 44.6 |
| 260. | (280) |
|
Kramer Levin | 44.5 |
| 261. | (270) |
|
Thompson Hine LLP | 44.5 |
| 262. | (267) |
|
Neves Solicitors LLP | 44.4 |
| 263. | (266) |
|
Brown Rudnick | 44.3 |
| 264. | (260) |
|
Archer & Greiner | 44.3 |
| 265. | (250) |
|
Howie, Sacks & Henry | 44.3 |
| 266. | (276) |
|
Macfarlanes LLP | 44.3 |
| 267. | (255) |
|
Lerner And Rowe | 44.3 |
| 268. | (269) |
|
Keoghs Law | 44.2 |
| 269. | (252) |
|
Clifford Law | 44.2 |
| 270. | (274) |
|
Brinks Gilson | 44.2 |
| 271. | (277) |
|
Wierzbowski Eversheds Sutherland | 44.0 |
| 272. | (258) |
|
Hughes Hubbard | 43.9 |
| 273. | (247) |
|
Sedgwick LLP | 43.9 |
| 274. | (288) |
|
Fladgate LLP | 43.9 |
| 275. | (272) |
|
DE BUEN R. ABOGADOS | 43.9 |
| 276. | (278) |
|
Fried Frank | 43.8 |
| 277. | (271) |
|
Boodle Hatfield LLP | 43.7 |
| 278. | (268) |
|
BuckleySandler LLP | 43.7 |
| 279. | (263) |
|
Dykema | 43.7 |
| 280. | (265) |
|
Baker & McKenzie MX | 43.7 |
| 281. | (264) |
|
Burg Simpson | 43.6 |
| 282. | (285) |
|
Day Pitney LLP | 43.3 |
| 283. | (273) |
|
Flaster/Greenberg | 43.3 |
| 284. | (275) |
|
Thompson & Knight | 43.2 |
| 285. | (282) |
|
Watson Farley & Williams LLP | 43.2 |
| 286. | (286) |
|
Lindquist & Vennum | 43.0 |
| 287. | (290) |
|
Cravath | 43.0 |
| 288. | (283) |
|
William Olson | 43.0 |
| 289. | (321) |
|
CGMB Law Firm | 43.0 |
| 290. | (284) |
|
Burns & Levinson LLP | 43.0 |
| 291. | (294) |
|
WeisbergKainenMark | 42.9 |
| 292. | (291) |
|
Schiff Hardin LLP | 42.7 |
| 293. | (292) |
|
PilieroMazza | 42.6 |
| 294. | (295) |
|
Stites & Harbison | 42.6 |
| 295. | (326) |
|
IM Business | 42.5 |
| 296. | (293) |
|
Schulte Roth & Zabel | 42.2 |
| 297. | (287) |
|
BBM Solicitors | 42.1 |
| 298. | (297) |
|
Stronachs LLP | 42.1 |
| 299. | (298) |
|
Wright Law Offices | 42.1 |
| 300. | (308) |
|
Sandler Travis, PA | 42.0 |
