About
Top Social Law Firms is a free online success tracking service specifically for law firms all over the world.
You can use the service to track your firm's social influence score as measured by Klout, updated once a week.
Why? So that you can see if you are improving your influence on social media then you are demonstrating your readiness for law in the digital 21st century.
Log In
By logging in you'll see your personal dashboard tracking your score over the past year.
Leaderboard
You can also see a "leaderboard" to see who are the the other leaders in your community.
Join
"Join" the list (link on the leaderboard page) with your Twitter account. If you are a bona fide law firm, you will be included in the list and your score will be published in the next release.
Follow
"Follow" the leaderboard (link on the leaderboard page) to receive an email update every time the board releases with new results (weekly)
This Rise board lists Law Firms from all around the world that have a presence on Twitter and ranks them on their social media influence.
We use Klout scores as a measure of social media influence.
The board will update weekly on Thursdays.
Click on "Join" if you wish to be included in the list and "Follow" if you wish to get a weekly update on how the firms score every week, the risers and fallers and relevant news about the community.
Hi all
I'm sorry to say that I will stop running the Social Law Firms after the last update in October on 26th Oct. There is not enough evidence that the weekly updates are engaging the followers or the participants on the board.
This week we saw the biggest climbs from Crowell & Moring (up 127 places to 157th), CAPSTICKS (up 65 places to 115th), and Hughes Hubbard (up 62 places to 246th).
| Rank | Law Firm | Total Score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | (2) |
|
CMS Cameron McKenna | 80.1 |
| 2. | (1) |
|
DLA Piper | 80.1 |
| 3. | (3) |
|
White & Case LLP | 79.0 |
| 4. | (4) |
|
Proskauer Rose LLP | 77.7 |
| 5. | (5) |
|
Fox Rothschild LLP | 76.8 |
| 6. | (6) |
|
Gowling WLG UK | 75.0 |
| 7. | (7) |
|
Bird & Bird | 74.9 |
| 8. | (8) |
|
Cozen O'Connor | 71.8 |
| 9. | (9) |
|
Cordell & Cordell | 69.3 |
| 10. | (10) |
|
McCarter English | 68.7 |
| 11. | (11) |
|
Irwin Mitchell | 64.0 |
| 12. | (12) |
|
Baker & McKenzie | 62.3 |
| 13. | (13) |
|
Orrick | 61.5 |
| 14. | (14) |
|
Squire Patton Boggs | 61.4 |
| 15. | (15) |
|
Burness Paull LLP | 61.0 |
| 16. | (18) |
|
Pinsent Masons | 60.9 |
| 17. | (16) |
|
NortonRoseFulbright | 60.9 |
| 18. | (17) |
|
Dentons | 60.8 |
| 19. | (30) |
|
FenwickWest | 60.1 |
| 20. | (19) |
|
WilmerHale | 58.9 |
| 21. | (21) |
|
Cooley LLP | 58.4 |
| 22. | (20) |
|
Latham & Watkins LLP | 58.3 |
| 23. | (27) |
|
Hogan Lovells | 58.3 |
| 24. | (25) |
|
Walker Morris LLP | 58.1 |
| 25. | (28) |
|
JONES DAY® | 58.1 |
| 26. | (24) |
|
Eversheds | 57.8 |
| 27. | (23) |
|
Baker Donelson | 57.7 |
| 28. | (22) |
|
GreenbergTraurig LLP | 57.1 |
| 29. | (29) |
|
Allen & Overy | 56.8 |
| 30. | (26) |
|
Trowers & Hamlins | 56.4 |
| 31. | (31) |
|
Bad Legal LLP | 56.3 |
| 32. | (32) |
|
Osborne Clarke | 55.9 |
| 33. | (50) |
|
Sidley Austin LLP | 55.7 |
| 34. | (34) |
|
Burges Salmon | 55.6 |
| 35. | (36) |
|
Hymans Robertson LLP | 55.3 |
| 36. | (35) |
|
Kirkland & Ellis | 55.2 |
| 37. | (52) |
|
Royds Withy King | 54.9 |
| 38. | (44) |
|
Mishcon De Reya | 54.9 |
| 39. | (38) |
|
Fasken Martineau | 54.9 |
| 40. | (43) |
|
Reed Smith LLP | 54.8 |
| 41. | (64) |
|
Wilson Sonsini | 54.8 |
| 42. | (37) |
|
Corrs (Law Firm) | 54.8 |
| 43. | (46) |
|
Mills & Reeve LLP | 54.8 |
| 44. | (51) |
|
Miller Thomson LLP | 54.7 |
| 45. | (39) |
|
K&L Gates LLP | 54.7 |
| 46. | (40) |
|
Holland & Knight | 54.7 |
| 47. | (55) |
|
Hodge Jones & Allen | 54.6 |
| 48. | (41) |
|
Fieldfisher | 54.5 |
| 49. | (47) |
|
Skadden, Arps | 54.4 |
| 50. | (42) |
|
HSFlegal | 54.4 |
| 51. | (53) |
|
SCHR | 54.1 |
| 52. | (67) |
|
Mintz Levin | 54.1 |
| 53. | (45) |
|
Morgan Lewis | 54.1 |
| 54. | (84) |
|
Perkins Coie | 54.0 |
| 55. | (48) |
|
BakerHostetler | 54.0 |
| 56. | (33) |
|
Nixon Peabody LLP | 54.0 |
| 57. | (105) |
|
Clifford Chance UK | 53.8 |
| 58. | (54) |
|
Stephensons | 53.7 |
| 59. | (78) |
|
Weightmans LLP | 53.7 |
| 60. | (70) |
|
Simpson Millar LLP | 53.6 |
| 61. | (61) |
|
VWV | 53.6 |
| 62. | (49) |
|
Clyde & | 53.6 |
| 63. | (69) |
|
Winston & Strawn LLP | 53.5 |
| 64. | (56) |
|
Freshfields | 53.5 |
| 65. | (57) |
|
Seyfarth Shaw LLP | 53.3 |
| 66. | (60) |
|
Linklaters LLP | 53.2 |
| 67. | (73) |
|
Simmons & Simmons | 53.2 |
| 68. | (58) |
|
DACBeachcroft | 53.2 |
| 69. | (68) |
|
Goodwin | 53.1 |
| 70. | (74) |
|
Foley & Lardner LLP | 53.0 |
| 71. | (72) |
|
Clarke Willmott LLP | 53.0 |
| 72. | (98) |
|
Fragomen | 52.9 |
| 73. | (107) |
|
Blank Rome LLP | 52.8 |
| 74. | (95) |
|
O'Melveny & Myers | 52.8 |
| 75. | (65) |
|
Covington | 52.7 |
| 76. | (66) |
|
Brodies LLP | 52.7 |
| 77. | (62) |
|
Thompson Coburn LLP | 52.6 |
| 78. | (59) |
|
Hill Dickinson LLP | 52.6 |
| 79. | (92) |
|
DWF LLP | 52.5 |
| 80. | (76) |
|
Ashurst | 52.5 |
| 81. | (136) |
|
Shearman & Sterling | 52.5 |
| 82. | (71) |
|
Jackson Lewis P.C. | 52.3 |
| 83. | (87) |
|
@BlakeMorganLLP | 52.3 |
| 84. | (77) |
|
Mayer Brown | 52.2 |
| 85. | (101) |
|
Addleshaw Goddard | 52.2 |
| 86. | (81) |
|
Ballard Spahr LLP | 52.2 |
| 87. | (86) |
|
King&WoodMallesons | 52.2 |
| 88. | (124) |
|
Haynes And Boone LLP | 52.2 |
| 89. | (89) |
|
King & Spalding | 52.1 |
| 90. | (85) |
|
Anderson Strathern | 52.1 |
| 91. | (94) |
|
Allens (Law Firm) | 52.1 |
| 92. | (132) |
|
MacRoberts LLP | 52.1 |
| 93. | (82) |
|
Ince & Co | 52.1 |
| 94. | (79) |
|
Minster Law | 52.0 |
| 95. | (80) |
|
Husch Blackwell | 52.0 |
| 96. | (75) |
|
Thrings Solicitors | 51.9 |
| 97. | (91) |
|
Polsinelli | 51.9 |
| 98. | (83) |
|
Torys LLP | 51.9 |
| 99. | (63) |
|
Shoosmiths | 51.8 |
| 100. | (96) |
|
McDermott | 51.8 |
