About
Top Social Law Firms is a free online success tracking service specifically for law firms all over the world.
You can use the service to track your firm's social influence score as measured by Klout, updated once a week.Â
Why? So that you can see if you are improving your influence on social media then you are demonstrating your readiness for law in the digital 21st century.
Log In
By logging in you'll see your personal dashboard tracking your score over the past year.
Leaderboard
You can also see a "leaderboard" to see who are the the other leaders in your community.
Join
"Join" the list (link on the leaderboard page) with your Twitter account. If you are a bona fide law firm, you will be included in the list and your score will be published in the next release.
Follow
"Follow" the leaderboard (link on the leaderboard page) to receive an email update every time the board releases with new results (weekly)
This Rise board lists Law Firms from all around the world that have a presence on Twitter and ranks them on their social media influence.
We use Klout scores as a measure of social media influence.
The board will update weekly on Thursdays.
Click on "Join" if you wish to be included in the list and "Follow" if you wish to get a weekly update on how the firms score every week, the risers and fallers and relevant news about the community.
| Rank | Law Firm | Total Score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 201. | (195) |
|
Miller Canfield | 46.9 |
| 202. | (204) |
|
Clifford Chance NL | 46.9 |
| 203. | (148) |
|
LaPolt Law | 46.9 |
| 204. | (212) |
|
Bircham Dyson Bell | 46.9 |
| 205. | (193) |
|
Lindquist & Vennum | 46.9 |
| 206. | (205) |
|
Bradley | 46.8 |
| 207. | (178) |
|
Winckworth Sherwood | 46.8 |
| 208. | (234) |
|
Farrer & Co | 46.8 |
| 209. | (199) |
|
Gowling WLG | 46.8 |
| 210. | (217) |
|
Troutman Sanders | 46.8 |
| 211. | (209) |
|
DMH Stallard | 46.8 |
| 212. | (201) |
|
Lowenstein Sandler | 46.8 |
| 213. | (206) |
|
Frost Brown Todd | 46.7 |
| 214. | (213) |
|
Turcan Connell | 46.7 |
| 215. | (215) |
|
Dinsmore & Shohl | 46.6 |
| 216. | (263) |
|
Archer & Greiner | 46.5 |
| 217. | (224) |
|
Sullivan & Worcester | 46.4 |
| 218. | (229) |
|
Gide Loyrette Nouel | 46.4 |
| 219. | (208) |
|
Benesch Law | 46.4 |
| 220. | (236) |
|
Deborah McMurray | 46.4 |
| 221. | (218) |
|
Buchanan | 46.2 |
| 222. | (207) |
|
Law Firm Marketing | 46.2 |
| 223. | (203) |
|
Balfour+Manson LLP | 46.2 |
| 224. | (221) |
|
Dawson Cornwell | 46.1 |
| 225. | (214) |
|
Stephenson Harwood | 46.1 |
| 226. | (216) |
|
Moore Blatch | 46.0 |
| 227. | (220) |
|
Cripps | 46.0 |
| 228. | (232) |
|
Stevens & Bolton | 45.9 |
| 229. | (255) |
|
Vedder Price | 45.8 |
| 230. | (231) |
|
NMM | 45.8 |
| 231. | (222) |
|
Snell & Wilmer | 45.6 |
| 232. | (226) |
|
WINSTEAD PC | 45.6 |
| 233. | (230) |
|
Jaburg|Wilk | 45.5 |
| 234. | (237) |
|
Howie, Sacks & Henry | 45.5 |
| 235. | (227) |
|
Hughes Hubbard | 45.4 |
| 236. | (243) |
|
Gardere Wynne Sewell | 45.3 |
| 237. | (258) |
|
Cadwalader | 45.3 |
| 238. | (235) |
|
Dickinson Wright | 45.3 |
| 239. | (262) |
|
Carlton Fields | 45.2 |
| 240. | (223) |
|
Gibbons P.C. | 45.1 |
| 241. | (238) |
|
Debevoise & Plimpton | 45.1 |
| 242. | (225) |
|
Sedgwick LLP | 45.1 |
| 243. | (241) |
|
Goulston & Storrs | 45.1 |
| 244. | (247) |
|
Forsters LLP | 45.1 |
| 245. | (283) |
|
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind | 45.0 |
| 246. | (260) |
|
Gillespie Macandrew | 45.0 |
| 247. | (244) |
|
McDonald Hopkins LLC | 44.9 |
| 248. | (251) |
|
Brownstein Hyatt | 44.9 |
| 249. | (257) |
|
Dykema | 44.8 |
| 250. | (245) |
|
Butler Snow LLP | 44.8 |
| 251. | (246) |
|
Loeb & Loeb LLP | 44.8 |
| 252. | (242) |
|
GrayRobinson, P.a. | 44.8 |
| 253. | (254) |
|
Travers Smith | 44.7 |
| 254. | (239) |
|
Hinshaw & Culbertson | 44.7 |
| 255. | (233) |
|
Flaster/Greenberg | 44.6 |
| 256. | (259) |
|
Schnader Harrison | 44.6 |
| 257. | (249) |
|
Davies | 44.6 |
| 258. | (248) |
|
Thompson Hine LLP | 44.6 |
| 259. | (279) |
|
Boodle Hatfield LLP | 44.5 |
| 260. | (252) |
|
GreenwoodsSolicitors | 44.4 |
| 261. | (276) |
|
BuckleySandler LLP | 44.4 |
| 262. | (264) |
|
StewartsLawLLP | 44.4 |
| 263. | (256) |
|
Baker & McKenzie MX | 44.4 |
| 264. | (250) |
|
Fried Frank | 44.2 |
| 265. | (267) |
|
Arent Fox LLP | 44.2 |
| 266. | (261) |
|
Kelley Drye & Warren | 44.2 |
| 267. | (330) |
|
DLA Piper Australia | 44.2 |
| 268. | (275) |
|
DavisPolkReg | 44.1 |
| 269. | (174) |
|
Blackadders | 44.1 |
| 270. | (287) |
|
Macfarlanes LLP | 44.0 |
| 271. | (253) |
|
Brinks Gilson | 43.9 |
| 272. | (270) |
|
BBM Solicitors | 43.9 |
| 273. | (266) |
|
DE BUEN R. ABOGADOS | 43.9 |
| 274. | (265) |
|
Thompson & Knight | 43.8 |
| 275. | (269) |
|
Keoghs Law | 43.8 |
| 276. | (273) |
|
Lerner And Rowe | 43.7 |
| 277. | (268) |
|
William Olson | 43.6 |
| 278. | (293) |
|
Langleys Solicitors | 43.6 |
| 279. | (280) |
|
Clifford Law | 43.5 |
| 280. | (278) |
|
Cravath | 43.4 |
| 281. | (272) |
|
Kramer Levin | 43.3 |
| 282. | (274) |
|
Day Pitney LLP | 43.2 |
| 283. | (286) |
|
Miller Hendry | 43.1 |
| 284. | (271) |
|
Stites & Harbison | 43.1 |
| 285. | (291) |
|
Fenwick Elliott LLP | 42.9 |
| 286. | (294) |
|
Wierzbowski Eversheds Sutherland | 42.9 |
| 287. | (281) |
|
Brown Rudnick | 42.9 |
| 288. | (277) |
|
Winthrop & Weinstine | 42.7 |
| 289. | (288) |
|
Schiff Hardin LLP | 42.7 |
| 290. | (284) |
|
Schulte Roth & Zabel | 42.6 |
| 291. | (282) |
|
WeisbergKainenMark | 42.6 |
| 292. | (296) |
|
Gordon & Rees | 42.4 |
| 293. | (304) |
|
Reminger Co., L.P.a. | 42.3 |
| 294. | (314) |
|
Stronachs LLP | 42.2 |
| 295. | (285) |
|
Neves Solicitors LLP | 42.2 |
| 296. | (290) |
|
Watson Farley & Williams LLP | 42.1 |
| 297. | (289) |
|
Burg Simpson | 42.1 |
| 298. | (298) |
|
Burns & Levinson LLP | 42.0 |
| 299. | (303) |
|
PilieroMazza | 42.0 |
| 300. | (297) |
|
Infrastructure Law | 41.7 |
