About
Top Social Law Firms is a free online success tracking service specifically for law firms all over the world.
You can use the service to track your firm's social influence score as measured by Klout, updated once a week.
Why? So that you can see if you are improving your influence on social media then you are demonstrating your readiness for law in the digital 21st century.
Log In
By logging in you'll see your personal dashboard tracking your score over the past year.
Leaderboard
You can also see a "leaderboard" to see who are the the other leaders in your community.
Join
"Join" the list (link on the leaderboard page) with your Twitter account. If you are a bona fide law firm, you will be included in the list and your score will be published in the next release.
Follow
"Follow" the leaderboard (link on the leaderboard page) to receive an email update every time the board releases with new results (weekly)
This Rise board lists Law Firms from all around the world that have a presence on Twitter and ranks them on their social media influence.
We use Klout scores as a measure of social media influence.
The board will update weekly on Thursdays.
Click on "Join" if you wish to be included in the list and "Follow" if you wish to get a weekly update on how the firms score every week, the risers and fallers and relevant news about the community.
| Rank | Law Firm | Total Score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 201. | (209) |
|
DMH Stallard | 46.7 |
| 202. | (196) |
|
Clifford Chance NL | 46.7 |
| 203. | (184) |
|
Bracewell | 46.7 |
| 204. | (205) |
|
Anderson Strathern | 46.7 |
| 205. | (199) |
|
Benesch Law | 46.6 |
| 206. | (201) |
|
LaPolt Law | 46.5 |
| 207. | (211) |
|
Dawson Cornwell | 46.4 |
| 208. | (198) |
|
Goulston & Storrs | 46.4 |
| 209. | (203) |
|
Troutman Sanders | 46.4 |
| 210. | (202) |
|
Buchanan | 46.4 |
| 211. | (210) |
|
Balfour+Manson LLP | 46.3 |
| 212. | (217) |
|
Snell & Wilmer | 46.1 |
| 213. | (220) |
|
Frost Brown Todd | 46.0 |
| 214. | (213) |
|
Cripps | 46.0 |
| 215. | (215) |
|
Minster Law | 46.0 |
| 216. | (219) |
|
NMM | 46.0 |
| 217. | (216) |
|
Sullivan & Worcester | 45.9 |
| 218. | (212) |
|
Howard Kennedy | 45.9 |
| 219. | (231) |
|
Cordell & Cordell | 45.8 |
| 220. | (221) |
|
Paul Hastings | 45.8 |
| 221. | (223) |
|
Moore Blatch | 45.8 |
| 222. | (255) |
|
Turcan Connell | 45.7 |
| 223. | (214) |
|
Deborah McMurray | 45.6 |
| 224. | (224) |
|
MMS | 45.6 |
| 225. | (227) |
|
Hughes Hubbard | 45.6 |
| 226. | (218) |
|
Debevoise & Plimpton | 45.5 |
| 227. | (230) |
|
Waller | 45.5 |
| 228. | (225) |
|
Gardere Wynne Sewell | 45.5 |
| 229. | (222) |
|
Flaster/Greenberg | 45.4 |
| 230. | (226) |
|
Hinshaw & Culbertson | 45.4 |
| 231. | (229) |
|
Butler Snow LLP | 45.4 |
| 232. | (228) |
|
Sedgwick LLP | 45.3 |
| 233. | (235) |
|
Fried Frank | 45.2 |
| 234. | (243) |
|
Loeb & Loeb LLP | 45.0 |
| 235. | (241) |
|
DLA Piper Australia | 45.0 |
| 236. | (233) |
|
McDonald Hopkins LLC | 45.0 |
| 237. | (242) |
|
Brinks Gilson | 45.0 |
| 238. | (237) |
|
Howie, Sacks & Henry | 45.0 |
| 239. | (232) |
|
Vedder Price | 45.0 |
| 240. | (244) |
|
GrayRobinson, P.a. | 44.9 |
| 241. | (234) |
|
Dinsmore & Shohl | 44.8 |
| 242. | (238) |
|
Davies | 44.8 |
| 243. | (245) |
|
Dickinson Wright | 44.7 |
| 244. | (240) |
|
Kelley Drye & Warren | 44.7 |
| 245. | (236) |
|
Goodmans LLP | 44.7 |
| 246. | (239) |
|
Thompson Hine LLP | 44.7 |
| 247. | (254) |
|
Stevens & Bolton | 44.6 |
| 248. | (256) |
|
Brownstein Hyatt | 44.6 |
| 249. | (269) |
|
Lindquist & Vennum | 44.5 |
| 250. | (262) |
|
Cadwalader | 44.5 |
| 251. | (253) |
|
Travers Smith | 44.5 |
| 252. | (248) |
|
Dykema | 44.5 |
| 253. | (250) |
|
Carlton Fields | 44.5 |
| 254. | (258) |
|
William Olson | 44.4 |
| 255. | (246) |
|
GreenwoodsSolicitors | 44.3 |
| 256. | (266) |
|
Gillespie Macandrew | 44.3 |
| 257. | (252) |
|
Kramer Levin | 44.2 |
| 258. | (270) |
|
Baker & McKenzie MX | 44.2 |
| 259. | (249) |
|
DavisPolkReg | 44.2 |
| 260. | (278) |
|
Stephenson Harwood | 44.1 |
| 261. | (251) |
|
Farrer & Co | 44.1 |
| 262. | (260) |
|
Archer & Greiner | 44.1 |
| 263. | (257) |
|
Schnader Harrison | 44.1 |
| 264. | (261) |
|
Cravath | 44.1 |
| 265. | (294) |
|
WINSTEAD PC | 44.0 |
| 266. | (264) |
|
Lerner And Rowe | 44.0 |
| 267. | (247) |
|
Gide Loyrette Nouel | 43.9 |
| 268. | (259) |
|
Forsters LLP | 43.9 |
| 269. | (263) |
|
Winthrop & Weinstine | 43.8 |
| 270. | (268) |
|
BBM Solicitors | 43.7 |
| 271. | (267) |
|
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind | 43.7 |
| 272. | (265) |
|
Arent Fox LLP | 43.7 |
| 273. | (271) |
|
Jaburg|Wilk | 43.6 |
| 274. | (286) |
|
Stites & Harbison | 43.5 |
| 275. | (276) |
|
Thompson & Knight | 43.5 |
| 276. | (273) |
|
Kasowitz Benson | 43.5 |
| 277. | (272) |
|
Keoghs Law | 43.4 |
| 278. | (285) |
|
WeisbergKainenMark | 43.2 |
| 279. | (274) |
|
Clifford Law | 43.0 |
| 280. | (275) |
|
Wierzbowski Eversheds Sutherland | 42.9 |
| 281. | (277) |
|
Langleys Solicitors | 42.9 |
| 282. | (288) |
|
Brown Rudnick | 42.9 |
| 283. | (298) |
|
BuckleySandler LLP | 42.8 |
| 284. | (280) |
|
Burg Simpson | 42.8 |
| 285. | (284) |
|
Neves Solicitors LLP | 42.7 |
| 286. | (279) |
|
Watson Farley & Williams LLP | 42.7 |
| 287. | (282) |
|
Sandler Travis, PA | 42.6 |
| 288. | (287) |
|
DE BUEN R. ABOGADOS | 42.6 |
| 289. | (281) |
|
Miller Hendry | 42.6 |
| 290. | (283) |
|
Chadbourne & Parke | 42.6 |
| 291. | (289) |
|
Schulte Roth & Zabel | 42.5 |
| 292. | (303) |
|
Law At Work | 42.4 |
| 293. | (290) |
|
StewartsLawLLP | 42.4 |
| 294. | (293) |
|
Burns & Levinson LLP | 42.3 |
| 295. | (291) |
|
PilieroMazza | 42.3 |
| 296. | (292) |
|
Day Pitney LLP | 42.2 |
| 297. | (296) |
|
Macfarlanes LLP | 42.1 |
| 298. | (297) |
|
Gordon & Rees | 42.0 |
| 299. | (304) |
|
Fenwick Elliott LLP | 41.9 |
| 300. | (295) |
|
Schiff Hardin LLP | 41.9 |
