Social Law Firms 3 Aug 2017 update

Collective goal

About

Top Social Law Firms is a free online success tracking service specifically for law firms all over the world.

You can use the service to track your firm's social influence score as measured by Klout, updated once a week. 

Why? So that you can see if you are improving your influence on social media then you are demonstrating your readiness for law in the digital 21st century.

Log In

By logging in you'll see your personal dashboard tracking your score over the past year.

Leaderboard

You can also see a "leaderboard" to see who are the the other leaders in your community.

Join

"Join" the list (link on the leaderboard page) with your Twitter account.  If you are a bona fide law firm,  you will be included in the list and your score will be published in the next release.

Follow

"Follow" the leaderboard (link on the leaderboard page) to receive an email update every time the board releases with new results (weekly)

Total Score: 0.0

Rise Social Media Social Law Firms Bulletins 3 Aug 2017 update

This Rise board lists Law Firms from all around the world that have a presence on Twitter and ranks them on their social media influence.

We use Klout scores as a measure of social media influence.

The board will update weekly on Thursdays.

Click on "Join" if you wish to be included in the list and "Follow" if you wish to get a weekly update on how the firms score every week, the risers and fallers and relevant news about the community.

Leaderboard Page 3

Rank Law Firm Total Score
201. profile image Gide Loyrette Nouel 46.5
202. profile image Goulston & Storrs 46.4
203. profile image Allen Matkins LLP 46.4
204. profile image Jenner & Block 46.4
205. profile image Arent Fox LLP 46.3
206. profile image Withersworldwide 46.3
207. profile image Archer & Greiner 46.3
208. profile image Bradley 46.3
209. profile image Dawson Cornwell 46.3
210. profile image Aird & Berlis LLP 46.3
211. profile image Brown Rudnick 46.2
212. profile image Troutman Sanders 46.2
213. profile image Basham 46.1
214. profile image Quarles & Brady LLP 46.1
215. profile image Travers Smith 46.1
216. profile image Stephenson Harwood 46.1
217. profile image Cordell & Cordell 46.0
218. profile image Stevens & Bolton 46.0
219. profile image Hughes Hubbard 46.0
220. profile image Snell & Wilmer 46.0
221. profile image Jackson Walker 45.9
222. profile image Cripps 45.9
223. profile image Frost Brown Todd 45.8
224. profile image Balfour+Manson LLP 45.8
225. profile image Goodmans LLP 45.7
226. profile image Howie, Sacks & Henry 45.6
227. profile image DLA Piper Canada 45.6
228. profile image Brownstein Hyatt 45.5
229. profile image GreenwoodsSolicitors 45.5
230. profile image Loeb & Loeb LLP 45.5
231. profile image Gardere Wynne Sewell 45.5
232. profile image Kelley Drye & Warren 45.4
233. profile image DLA Piper Australia 45.4
234. profile image NMM 45.3
235. profile image DavisPolkReg 45.3
236. profile image Paul, Weiss, Rifkind 45.3
237. profile image McDonald Hopkins LLC 45.3
238. profile image Hinshaw & Culbertson 45.3
239. profile image Kennedys Law LLP 45.2
240. profile image Butler Snow LLP 45.2
241. profile image Turcan Connell 45.2
242. profile image Deborah McMurray 45.1
243. profile image Dinsmore & Shohl 45.1
244. profile image Farrer & Co 45.1
245. profile image Carlton Fields 45.1
246. profile image Lowenstein Sandler 45.1
247. profile image Waller 45.0
248. profile image Flaster/Greenberg 45.0
249. profile image Schnader Harrison 45.0
250. profile image Keoghs Law 45.0
251. profile image Benesch Law 44.9
252. profile image Chadbourne & Parke 44.9
253. profile image Cadwalader 44.8
254. profile image Cravath 44.8
255. profile image Kramer Levin 44.7
256. profile image Dykema 44.7
257. profile image Dickinson Wright 44.5
258. profile image Winthrop & Weinstine 44.5
259. profile image Neves Solicitors LLP 44.5
260. profile image GrayRobinson, P.a. 44.4
261. profile image StewartsLawLLP 44.3
262. profile image Davies 44.3
263. profile image Fried Frank 44.2
264. profile image Forsters LLP 44.1
265. profile image William Olson 43.9
266. profile image Vedder Price 43.9
267. profile image Howes Percival 43.9
268. profile image Law Firm Marketing 43.8
269. profile image Langleys Solicitors 43.8
270. profile image Wierzbowski Eversheds Sutherland 43.8
271. profile image Baker & McKenzie MX 43.7
272. profile image Miller Hendry 43.7
273. profile image Gillespie Macandrew 43.6
274. profile image Clifford Law 43.6
275. profile image Schiff Hardin LLP 43.5
276. profile image Boodle Hatfield LLP 43.5
277. profile image Day Pitney LLP 43.4
278. profile image Gibbons P.C. 43.3
279. profile image Sterne Kessler 43.3
280. profile image Burford 43.3
281. profile image Gordon & Rees 43.2
282. profile image Schulte Roth & Zabel 43.1
283. profile image Jaburg|Wilk 43.1
284. profile image Lerner And Rowe 42.9
285. profile image Stites & Harbison 42.8
286. profile image Fenwick Elliott LLP 42.7
287. profile image BuckleySandler LLP 42.7
288. profile image Brinks Gilson 42.6
289. profile image Sedgwick LLP 42.5
290. profile image Reminger Co., L.P.a. 42.4
291. profile image Bircham Dyson Bell 42.4
292. profile image Federal Contracting 42.3
293. profile image Burns & Levinson LLP 42.3
294. profile image CRS_Family 42.2
295. profile image Burg Simpson 42.2
296. profile image PilieroMazza 42.2
297. profile image Macfarlanes LLP 42.1
298. profile image Stronachs LLP 42.1
299. profile image WINSTEAD PC 42.1
300. profile image Sandler Travis, PA 42.1
  • Bulletin name:
    3 Aug 2017 update
  • Bulletin published at:
    9:00am - 3rd Aug 2017
  • Score Period:
    27th Jul - 3rd Aug 2017
  • Previous Bulletin name:
  • Previous Bulletin published at:
    9:00am - 27th Jul 2017
  • Data Sources: