Social Law Firms 13 Jul 2017 update

Collective goal

About

Top Social Law Firms is a free online success tracking service specifically for law firms all over the world.

You can use the service to track your firm's social influence score as measured by Klout, updated once a week. 

Why? So that you can see if you are improving your influence on social media then you are demonstrating your readiness for law in the digital 21st century.

Log In

By logging in you'll see your personal dashboard tracking your score over the past year.

Leaderboard

You can also see a "leaderboard" to see who are the the other leaders in your community.

Join

"Join" the list (link on the leaderboard page) with your Twitter account.  If you are a bona fide law firm,  you will be included in the list and your score will be published in the next release.

Follow

"Follow" the leaderboard (link on the leaderboard page) to receive an email update every time the board releases with new results (weekly)

Total Score: 0.0

Rise Social Media Social Law Firms Bulletins 13 Jul 2017 update

This Rise board lists Law Firms from all around the world that have a presence on Twitter and ranks them on their social media influence.

We use Klout scores as a measure of social media influence.

The board will update weekly on Thursdays.

Click on "Join" if you wish to be included in the list and "Follow" if you wish to get a weekly update on how the firms score every week, the risers and fallers and relevant news about the community.

Leaderboard Page 3

Rank Law Firm Total Score
201. profile image Travers Smith 47.2
202. profile image Stevens & Bolton 47.1
203. profile image GrayRobinson, P.a. 47.0
204. profile image Gide Loyrette Nouel 47.0
205. profile image ShoosmithsLaw 46.9
206. profile image Aird & Berlis LLP 46.9
207. profile image Brownstein Hyatt 46.9
208. profile image Gardere Wynne Sewell 46.8
209. profile image Miller Canfield 46.8
210. profile image Gordons LLP 46.7
211. profile image Basham 46.7
212. profile image Brown Rudnick 46.7
213. profile image Hughes Hubbard 46.6
214. profile image Dawson Cornwell 46.5
215. profile image Goulston & Storrs 46.4
216. profile image Allen Matkins LLP 46.4
217. profile image Bradley 46.3
218. profile image DLA Piper Canada 46.3
219. profile image Withersworldwide 46.2
220. profile image Snell & Wilmer 46.2
221. profile image MMS 46.2
222. profile image NMM 46.1
223. profile image Arent Fox LLP 46.0
224. profile image DLA Piper Australia 46.0
225. profile image Angela Wang & Co 46.0
226. profile image Flaster/Greenberg 45.9
227. profile image Stephenson Harwood 45.9
228. profile image Goodmans LLP 45.9
229. profile image Farrer & Co 45.8
230. profile image Butler Snow LLP 45.7
231. profile image Howie, Sacks & Henry 45.7
232. profile image Paul, Weiss, Rifkind 45.7
233. profile image Dykema 45.6
234. profile image Turcan Connell 45.6
235. profile image Cravath 45.5
236. profile image McDonald Hopkins LLC 45.5
237. profile image Law Firm Marketing 45.5
238. profile image Troutman Sanders 45.4
239. profile image Lowenstein Sandler 45.3
240. profile image Loeb & Loeb LLP 45.3
241. profile image DavisPolkReg 45.2
242. profile image Kramer Levin 45.2
243. profile image Morisons Solicitors 45.2
244. profile image Chadbourne & Parke 45.2
245. profile image Deborah McMurray 45.1
246. profile image Dinsmore & Shohl 45.0
247. profile image Keoghs Law 44.9
248. profile image GreenwoodsSolicitors 44.9
249. profile image Minster Law 44.9
250. profile image Kelley Drye & Warren 44.8
251. profile image Cadwalader 44.8
252. profile image Dickinson Wright 44.7
253. profile image Carlton Fields 44.6
254. profile image Waller 44.6
255. profile image Hinshaw & Culbertson 44.6
256. profile image Frost Brown Todd 44.6
257. profile image Sterne Kessler 44.5
258. profile image Fried Frank 44.4
259. profile image Neves Solicitors LLP 44.4
260. profile image Winthrop & Weinstine 44.4
261. profile image Schnader Harrison 44.3
262. profile image Forsters LLP 44.3
263. profile image Balfour+Manson LLP 44.3
264. profile image Baker & McKenzie MX 44.3
265. profile image Langleys Solicitors 44.2
266. profile image Gillespie Macandrew 44.1
267. profile image StewartsLawLLP 44.1
268. profile image Jackson Walker 44.1
269. profile image Thompson Hine LLP 44.1
270. profile image Davies 44.0
271. profile image Clifford Law 44.0
272. profile image Watson Farley & Williams LLP 43.9
273. profile image Benesch Law 43.7
274. profile image Schulte Roth & Zabel 43.7
275. profile image BuckleySandler LLP 43.6
276. profile image Vedder Price 43.6
277. profile image Lerner And Rowe 43.4
278. profile image Schiff Hardin LLP 43.4
279. profile image WINSTEAD PC 43.4
280. profile image Wierzbowski Eversheds Sutherland 43.4
281. profile image Burford 43.3
282. profile image Fenwick Elliott LLP 43.2
283. profile image Day Pitney LLP 43.2
284. profile image Sedgwick LLP 43.2
285. profile image WeisbergKainenMark 42.9
286. profile image William Olson 42.9
287. profile image Burns & Levinson LLP 42.9
288. profile image Boodle Hatfield LLP 42.8
289. profile image Brinks Gilson 42.8
290. profile image LaPolt Law 42.8
291. profile image Stites & Harbison 42.7
292. profile image DE BUEN R. ABOGADOS 42.6
293. profile image Sandler Travis, PA 42.4
294. profile image Jaburg|Wilk 42.3
295. profile image Gordon & Rees 42.2
296. profile image Stronachs LLP 42.1
297. profile image Reminger Co., L.P.a. 41.9
298. profile image Macfarlanes LLP 41.9
299. profile image Law At Work 41.9
300. profile image Burg Simpson 41.8
  • Bulletin name:
    13 Jul 2017 update
  • Bulletin published at:
    9:00am - 13th Jul 2017
  • Score Period:
    6th Jul - 13th Jul 2017
  • Previous Bulletin name:
    6 Jul 2017 update
  • Previous Bulletin published at:
    9:00am - 6th Jul 2017
  • Data Sources:
    Klout