About
Top Social Law Firms is a free online success tracking service specifically for law firms all over the world.
You can use the service to track your firm's social influence score as measured by Klout, updated once a week.
Why? So that you can see if you are improving your influence on social media then you are demonstrating your readiness for law in the digital 21st century.
Log In
By logging in you'll see your personal dashboard tracking your score over the past year.
Leaderboard
You can also see a "leaderboard" to see who are the the other leaders in your community.
Join
"Join" the list (link on the leaderboard page) with your Twitter account. If you are a bona fide law firm, you will be included in the list and your score will be published in the next release.
Follow
"Follow" the leaderboard (link on the leaderboard page) to receive an email update every time the board releases with new results (weekly)
This Rise board lists Law Firms from all around the world that have a presence on Twitter and ranks them on their social media influence.
We use Klout scores as a measure of social media influence.
The board will update weekly on Thursdays.
Click on "Join" if you wish to be included in the list and "Follow" if you wish to get a weekly update on how the firms score every week, the risers and fallers and relevant news about the community.
| Rank | Law Firm | Total Score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 201. | (211) |
|
Moore Blatch | 47.6 |
| 202. | (209) |
|
Allen Matkins LLP | 47.4 |
| 203. | (182) |
|
Hunton & Williams | 47.4 |
| 204. | (184) |
|
Hughes Hubbard | 47.3 |
| 205. | (191) |
|
Clifford Chance NL | 47.3 |
| 206. | (225) |
|
Gordons LLP | 47.2 |
| 207. | (205) |
|
Snell & Wilmer | 47.2 |
| 208. | (192) |
|
Gardere Wynne Sewell | 47.2 |
| 209. | (197) |
|
Frost Brown Todd | 47.2 |
| 210. | (207) |
|
HollandHart | 47.1 |
| 211. | (231) |
|
Howie, Sacks & Henry | 47.0 |
| 212. | (206) |
|
Arent Fox LLP | 46.9 |
| 213. | (218) |
|
Gide Loyrette Nouel | 46.9 |
| 214. | (227) |
|
Stevens & Bolton | 46.8 |
| 215. | (221) |
|
ShoosmithsLaw | 46.8 |
| 216. | (232) |
|
Angela Wang & Co | 46.7 |
| 217. | (208) |
|
Lowenstein Sandler | 46.7 |
| 218. | (210) |
|
Bradley | 46.6 |
| 219. | (230) |
|
Basham | 46.6 |
| 220. | (224) |
|
Minster Law | 46.6 |
| 221. | (220) |
|
Dorsey & Whitney | 46.5 |
| 222. | (229) |
|
Stephenson Harwood | 46.5 |
| 223. | (228) |
|
Loeb & Loeb LLP | 46.3 |
| 224. | (216) |
|
Hogan Lovells | 46.3 |
| 225. | (202) |
|
Brownstein Hyatt | 46.2 |
| 226. | (251) |
|
Kramer Levin | 46.2 |
| 227. | (226) |
|
Goodmans LLP | 46.2 |
| 228. | (233) |
|
NMM | 46.2 |
| 229. | (223) |
|
DLA Piper Canada | 46.1 |
| 230. | (214) |
|
Dawson Cornwell | 46.1 |
| 231. | (217) |
|
Dinsmore & Shohl | 46.1 |
| 232. | (203) |
|
Turcan Connell | 45.9 |
| 233. | (222) |
|
GrayRobinson, P.a. | 45.9 |
| 234. | (215) |
|
Thompson Hine LLP | 45.9 |
| 235. | (236) |
|
Kelley Drye & Warren | 45.8 |
| 236. | (237) |
|
Butler Snow LLP | 45.8 |
| 237. | (219) |
|
McDonald Hopkins LLC | 45.8 |
| 238. | (264) |
|
Carlton Fields | 45.7 |
| 239. | (235) |
|
Troutman Sanders | 45.7 |
| 240. | (249) |
|
Forsters LLP | 45.7 |
| 241. | (244) |
|
Dykema | 45.6 |
| 242. | (245) |
|
Law Firm Marketing | 45.5 |
| 243. | (240) |
|
Withersworldwide | 45.5 |
| 244. | (247) |
|
HFW | 45.5 |
| 245. | (250) |
|
Sterne Kessler | 45.4 |
| 246. | (234) |
|
Watson Farley & Williams LLP | 45.3 |
| 247. | (239) |
|
Hinshaw & Culbertson | 45.3 |
| 248. | (283) |
|
Morisons Solicitors | 45.3 |
| 249. | (253) |
|
Vedder Price | 45.2 |
| 250. | (257) |
|
Neves Solicitors LLP | 45.2 |
| 251. | (248) |
|
Waller | 45.1 |
| 252. | (277) |
|
Balfour+Manson LLP | 45.1 |
| 253. | (260) |
|
Jackson Walker | 45.0 |
| 254. | (252) |
|
Dickinson Wright | 44.9 |
| 255. | (258) |
|
GreenwoodsSolicitors | 44.8 |
| 256. | (259) |
|
Day Pitney LLP | 44.8 |
| 257. | (255) |
|
BuckleySandler LLP | 44.8 |
| 258. | (243) |
|
Cravath | 44.8 |
| 259. | (254) |
|
Keoghs Law | 44.7 |
| 260. | (263) |
|
Farrer & Co | 44.7 |
| 261. | (238) |
|
DLA Piper Australia | 44.7 |
| 262. | (269) |
|
Schulte Roth & Zabel | 44.6 |
| 263. | (256) |
|
Benesch Law | 44.6 |
| 264. | (273) |
|
Cadwalader | 44.4 |
| 265. | (266) |
|
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind | 44.4 |
| 266. | (246) |
|
Deborah McMurray | 44.4 |
| 267. | (242) |
|
Miller Hendry | 44.3 |
| 268. | (261) |
|
StewartsLawLLP | 44.3 |
| 269. | (265) |
|
Clifford Law | 44.2 |
| 270. | (281) |
|
Fried Frank | 44.2 |
| 271. | (262) |
|
Gillespie Macandrew | 44.1 |
| 272. | (267) |
|
Flaster/Greenberg | 44.0 |
| 273. | (276) |
|
Brinks Gilson | 43.9 |
| 274. | (286) |
|
Schnader Harrison | 43.8 |
| 275. | (270) |
|
Langleys Solicitors | 43.8 |
| 276. | (268) |
|
DavisPolkReg | 43.7 |
| 277. | (278) |
|
WINSTEAD PC | 43.7 |
| 278. | (272) |
|
Davies | 43.7 |
| 279. | (275) |
|
Wierzbowski Eversheds Sutherland | 43.7 |
| 280. | (271) |
|
Sedgwick LLP | 43.7 |
| 281. | (274) |
|
Schiff Hardin LLP | 43.7 |
| 282. | (289) |
|
Baker & McKenzie MX | 43.4 |
| 283. | (292) |
|
Burford | 43.3 |
| 284. | (285) |
|
William Olson | 43.3 |
| 285. | (291) |
|
Stites & Harbison | 43.2 |
| 286. | (294) |
|
Reminger Co., L.P.a. | 43.0 |
| 287. | (282) |
|
Jaburg|Wilk | 43.0 |
| 288. | (284) |
|
WeisbergKainenMark | 42.9 |
| 289. | (279) |
|
Fenwick Elliott LLP | 42.8 |
| 290. | (280) |
|
Winthrop & Weinstine | 42.6 |
| 291. | (290) |
|
Boodle Hatfield LLP | 42.6 |
| 292. | (307) |
|
Pullman & Comley | 42.5 |
| 293. | (287) |
|
Lerner And Rowe | 42.5 |
| 294. | (296) |
|
DE BUEN R. ABOGADOS | 42.4 |
| 295. | (288) |
|
Infrastructure Law | 42.4 |
| 296. | (298) |
|
Chadbourne & Parke | 42.4 |
| 297. | (293) |
|
Gibbons P.C. | 42.3 |
| 298. | (299) |
|
Macfarlanes LLP | 42.2 |
| 299. | (301) |
|
Burg Simpson | 42.2 |
| 300. | (297) |
|
Gordon & Rees | 41.9 |
