About
Top Social Law Firms is a free online success tracking service specifically for law firms all over the world.
You can use the service to track your firm's social influence score as measured by Klout, updated once a week.
Why? So that you can see if you are improving your influence on social media then you are demonstrating your readiness for law in the digital 21st century.
Log In
By logging in you'll see your personal dashboard tracking your score over the past year.
Leaderboard
You can also see a "leaderboard" to see who are the the other leaders in your community.
Join
"Join" the list (link on the leaderboard page) with your Twitter account. If you are a bona fide law firm, you will be included in the list and your score will be published in the next release.
Follow
"Follow" the leaderboard (link on the leaderboard page) to receive an email update every time the board releases with new results (weekly)
This Rise board lists Law Firms from all around the world that have a presence on Twitter and ranks them on their social media influence.
We use Klout scores as a measure of social media influence.
The board will update weekly on Thursdays.
Click on "Join" if you wish to be included in the list and "Follow" if you wish to get a weekly update on how the firms score every week, the risers and fallers and relevant news about the community.
| Rank | Law Firm | Total Score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 201. | (199) |
|
Robinson+Cole | 47.0 |
| 202. | (201) |
|
Allen Matkins LLP | 47.0 |
| 203. | (205) |
|
Cripps | 46.9 |
| 204. | (208) |
|
HollandHart | 46.9 |
| 205. | (203) |
|
DLA Piper Australia | 46.9 |
| 206. | (211) |
|
DLA Piper Canada | 46.8 |
| 207. | (212) |
|
Dinsmore & Shohl | 46.7 |
| 208. | (220) |
|
NMM | 46.7 |
| 209. | (217) |
|
Loeb & Loeb LLP | 46.7 |
| 210. | (94) |
|
Husch Blackwell | 46.7 |
| 211. | (209) |
|
TLT TLT | 46.6 |
| 212. | (204) |
|
Thompson Hine LLP | 46.6 |
| 213. | (228) |
|
Goulston & Storrs | 46.6 |
| 214. | (198) |
|
Stevens & Bolton | 46.5 |
| 215. | (210) |
|
Withersworldwide | 46.5 |
| 216. | (222) |
|
Bircham Dyson Bell | 46.5 |
| 217. | (226) |
|
Minster Law | 46.4 |
| 218. | (225) |
|
Snell & Wilmer | 46.4 |
| 219. | (216) |
|
Dorsey & Whitney | 46.4 |
| 220. | (218) |
|
Stephenson Harwood | 46.4 |
| 221. | (202) |
|
Deborah McMurray | 46.3 |
| 222. | (207) |
|
CAPSTICKS | 46.3 |
| 223. | (213) |
|
Watson Farley & Williams LLP | 46.2 |
| 224. | (234) |
|
Gordons LLP | 46.2 |
| 225. | (239) |
|
Sullivan & Worcester | 46.2 |
| 226. | (214) |
|
Kelley Drye & Warren | 46.2 |
| 227. | (219) |
|
Troutman Sanders | 46.2 |
| 228. | (230) |
|
GrayRobinson, P.a. | 46.1 |
| 229. | (229) |
|
Moore Blatch | 46.1 |
| 230. | (227) |
|
Gide Loyrette Nouel | 45.9 |
| 231. | (244) |
|
Howie, Sacks & Henry | 45.9 |
| 232. | (215) |
|
StewartsLawLLP | 45.8 |
| 233. | (237) |
|
Basham | 45.8 |
| 234. | (224) |
|
Butler Snow LLP | 45.8 |
| 235. | (231) |
|
Winckworth Sherwood | 45.7 |
| 236. | (240) |
|
Dickinson Wright | 45.7 |
| 237. | (232) |
|
Hinshaw & Culbertson | 45.6 |
| 238. | (241) |
|
Vorys | 45.6 |
| 239. | (235) |
|
Angela Wang & Co | 45.5 |
| 240. | (223) |
|
Forsters LLP | 45.5 |
| 241. | (106) |
|
Covington | 45.4 |
| 242. | (233) |
|
Law Firm Marketing | 45.4 |
| 243. | (246) |
|
Dykema | 45.4 |
| 244. | (273) |
|
HBJ Gateley | 45.4 |
| 245. | (270) |
|
Cravath | 45.3 |
| 246. | (245) |
|
HFW | 45.2 |
| 247. | (236) |
|
Sterne Kessler | 45.2 |
| 248. | (254) |
|
Jackson Walker | 45.1 |
| 249. | (247) |
|
DavisPolkReg | 45.0 |
| 250. | (249) |
|
Brown Rudnick | 45.0 |
| 251. | (257) |
|
Clifford Law | 44.9 |
| 252. | (242) |
|
Vedder Price | 44.8 |
| 253. | (248) |
|
Sedgwick LLP | 44.8 |
| 254. | (259) |
|
GreenwoodsSolicitors | 44.7 |
| 255. | (253) |
|
Gillespie Macandrew | 44.6 |
| 256. | (283) |
|
Neves Solicitors LLP | 44.6 |
| 257. | (250) |
|
Carlton Fields | 44.6 |
| 258. | (265) |
|
Day Pitney LLP | 44.5 |
| 259. | (262) |
|
Turcan Connell | 44.5 |
| 260. | (252) |
|
Waller | 44.4 |
| 261. | (255) |
|
Cadwalader | 44.4 |
| 262. | (269) |
|
Flaster/Greenberg | 44.3 |
| 263. | (263) |
|
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind | 44.3 |
| 264. | (258) |
|
Winthrop & Weinstine | 44.3 |
| 265. | (260) |
|
Benesch Law | 44.2 |
| 266. | (267) |
|
Schnader Harrison | 44.2 |
| 267. | (251) |
|
Kramer Levin | 44.2 |
| 268. | (286) |
|
Keoghs Law | 44.2 |
| 269. | (264) |
|
Schulte Roth & Zabel | 44.1 |
| 270. | (261) |
|
Lerner And Rowe | 44.0 |
| 271. | (256) |
|
Dawson Cornwell | 44.0 |
| 272. | (272) |
|
Fried Frank | 44.0 |
| 273. | (285) |
|
Wierzbowski Eversheds Sutherland | 44.0 |
| 274. | (195) |
|
MMS | 44.0 |
| 275. | (274) |
|
Farrer & Co | 43.9 |
| 276. | (275) |
|
WeisbergKainenMark | 43.7 |
| 277. | (280) |
|
Balfour+Manson LLP | 43.6 |
| 278. | (282) |
|
Brinks Gilson | 43.5 |
| 279. | (276) |
|
Boodle Hatfield LLP | 43.4 |
| 280. | (290) |
|
Langleys Solicitors | 43.4 |
| 281. | (266) |
|
Miller Hendry | 43.4 |
| 282. | (288) |
|
WINSTEAD PC | 43.4 |
| 283. | (279) |
|
Davies | 43.3 |
| 284. | (281) |
|
William Olson | 43.3 |
| 285. | (277) |
|
Jaburg|Wilk | 43.3 |
| 286. | (271) |
|
Stites & Harbison | 43.3 |
| 287. | (268) |
|
BuckleySandler LLP | 43.2 |
| 288. | (287) |
|
Fenwick Elliott LLP | 43.2 |
| 289. | (278) |
|
Chadbourne & Parke | 43.0 |
| 290. | (298) |
|
Morisons Solicitors | 42.9 |
| 291. | (301) |
|
Baker & McKenzie MX | 42.9 |
| 292. | (291) |
|
Schiff Hardin LLP | 42.6 |
| 293. | (300) |
|
Stronachs LLP | 42.4 |
| 294. | (284) |
|
Macfarlanes LLP | 42.3 |
| 295. | (294) |
|
Burg Simpson | 42.2 |
| 296. | (289) |
|
Burford | 42.2 |
| 297. | (292) |
|
Burns & Levinson LLP | 42.1 |
| 298. | (296) |
|
Reminger Co., L.P.a. | 42.0 |
| 299. | (303) |
|
Murthy Law Firm | 41.9 |
| 300. | (293) |
|
Fladgate LLP | 41.8 |
