Social Law Firms 18 May 2017 update

Collective goal

About

Top Social Law Firms is a free online success tracking service specifically for law firms all over the world.

You can use the service to track your firm's social influence score as measured by Klout, updated once a week. 

Why? So that you can see if you are improving your influence on social media then you are demonstrating your readiness for law in the digital 21st century.

Log In

By logging in you'll see your personal dashboard tracking your score over the past year.

Leaderboard

You can also see a "leaderboard" to see who are the the other leaders in your community.

Join

"Join" the list (link on the leaderboard page) with your Twitter account.  If you are a bona fide law firm,  you will be included in the list and your score will be published in the next release.

Follow

"Follow" the leaderboard (link on the leaderboard page) to receive an email update every time the board releases with new results (weekly)

Total Score: 0.0

Rise Social Media Social Law Firms Bulletins 18 May 2017 update

This Rise board lists Law Firms from all around the world that have a presence on Twitter and ranks them on their social media influence.

We use Klout scores as a measure of social media influence.

The board will update weekly on Thursdays.

Click on "Join" if you wish to be included in the list and "Follow" if you wish to get a weekly update on how the firms score every week, the risers and fallers and relevant news about the community.

Leaderboard Page 3

Rank Law Firm Total Score
201. profile image Aird & Berlis LLP 47.0
202. profile image Winckworth Sherwood 46.9
203. profile image MMS 46.9
204. profile image Allen Matkins LLP 46.8
205. profile image Clifford Chance NL 46.7
206. profile image Goulston & Storrs 46.7
207. profile image TLT TLT 46.6
208. profile image DLA Piper Australia 46.6
209. profile image Cripps 46.6
210. profile image Hogan Lovells 46.6
211. profile image HollandHart 46.5
212. profile image CAPSTICKS 46.5
213. profile image Butler Snow LLP 46.4
214. profile image GrayRobinson, P.a. 46.4
215. profile image Dinsmore & Shohl 46.4
216. profile image Gordons LLP 46.4
217. profile image Dorsey & Whitney 46.3
218. profile image Withersworldwide 46.3
219. profile image Hunton & Williams 46.2
220. profile image Bircham Dyson Bell 46.2
221. profile image Debevoise & Plimpton 46.2
222. profile image Minster Law 46.1
223. profile image Gide Loyrette Nouel 46.1
224. profile image Loeb & Loeb LLP 46.0
225. profile image Sullivan & Worcester 46.0
226. profile image Snell & Wilmer 45.9
227. profile image Angela Wang & Co 45.8
228. profile image Riebesehl Family Law 45.8
229. profile image Moore Blatch 45.7
230. profile image Law Firm Marketing 45.7
231. profile image NMM 45.7
232. profile image Hinshaw & Culbertson 45.7
233. profile image HFW 45.6
234. profile image Sterne Kessler 45.6
235. profile image Carlton Fields 45.5
236. profile image Kelley Drye & Warren 45.5
237. profile image Gillespie Macandrew 45.5
238. profile image Vorys 45.4
239. profile image Howie, Sacks & Henry 45.4
240. profile image DavisPolkReg 45.4
241. profile image Vedder Price 45.4
242. profile image Dawson Cornwell 45.3
243. profile image Miller Hendry 45.3
244. profile image Sedgwick LLP 45.3
245. profile image Dickinson Wright 45.2
246. profile image Kramer Levin 45.2
247. profile image Dykema 45.1
248. profile image Watson Farley & Williams LLP 45.0
249. profile image Paul, Weiss, Rifkind 44.8
250. profile image Cadwalader 44.8
251. profile image Clifford Law 44.8
252. profile image Jackson Walker 44.8
253. profile image Forsters LLP 44.7
254. profile image Archer & Greiner 44.6
255. profile image Basham 44.6
256. profile image Lerner And Rowe 44.6
257. profile image Benesch Law 44.6
258. profile image Brown Rudnick 44.5
259. profile image Day Pitney LLP 44.5
260. profile image Winthrop & Weinstine 44.4
261. profile image Schulte Roth & Zabel 44.3
262. profile image Fried Frank 44.3
263. profile image WeisbergKainenMark 44.2
264. profile image BuckleySandler LLP 44.2
265. profile image Turcan Connell 44.1
266. profile image Davies 44.1
267. profile image Wierzbowski Eversheds Sutherland 44.0
268. profile image Stites & Harbison 44.0
269. profile image HBJ Gateley 44.0
270. profile image Chadbourne & Parke 43.9
271. profile image Flaster/Greenberg 43.9
272. profile image Cravath 43.9
273. profile image Brinks Gilson 43.8
274. profile image Waller 43.8
275. profile image Farrer & Co 43.8
276. profile image GreenwoodsSolicitors 43.8
277. profile image Keoghs Law 43.7
278. profile image Schnader Harrison 43.7
279. profile image Macfarlanes LLP 43.6
280. profile image Boodle Hatfield LLP 43.5
281. profile image William Olson 43.4
282. profile image Jaburg|Wilk 43.3
283. profile image WINSTEAD PC 43.3
284. profile image Morisons Solicitors 43.1
285. profile image Fenwick Elliott LLP 43.1
286. profile image Balfour+Manson LLP 43.0
287. profile image Lindsays Solicitors 43.0
288. profile image Neves Solicitors LLP 42.9
289. profile image Schiff Hardin LLP 42.9
290. profile image Langleys Solicitors 42.8
291. profile image Fladgate LLP 42.6
292. profile image CRS_Family 42.6
293. profile image Infrastructure Law 42.5
294. profile image Beltrami & Co 42.3
295. profile image Reminger Co., L.P.a. 42.2
296. profile image Burford 42.0
297. profile image Gibbons P.C. 42.0
298. profile image LaPolt Law 41.9
299. profile image Baker & McKenzie MX 41.9
300. profile image Law At Work 41.7
  • Bulletin name:
    18 May 2017 update
  • Bulletin published at:
    9:00am - 18th May 2017
  • Score Period:
    11th May - 18th May 2017
  • Previous Bulletin name:
  • Previous Bulletin published at:
    9:00am - 11th May 2017
  • Data Sources: