Social Law Firms 27 Apr 2017 update

Collective goal

About

Top Social Law Firms is a free online success tracking service specifically for law firms all over the world.

You can use the service to track your firm's social influence score as measured by Klout, updated once a week. 

Why? So that you can see if you are improving your influence on social media then you are demonstrating your readiness for law in the digital 21st century.

Log In

By logging in you'll see your personal dashboard tracking your score over the past year.

Leaderboard

You can also see a "leaderboard" to see who are the the other leaders in your community.

Join

"Join" the list (link on the leaderboard page) with your Twitter account.  If you are a bona fide law firm,  you will be included in the list and your score will be published in the next release.

Follow

"Follow" the leaderboard (link on the leaderboard page) to receive an email update every time the board releases with new results (weekly)

Total Score: 0.0

Rise Social Media Social Law Firms Bulletins 27 Apr 2017 update

This Rise board lists Law Firms from all around the world that have a presence on Twitter and ranks them on their social media influence.

We use Klout scores as a measure of social media influence.

The board will update weekly on Thursdays.

Click on "Join" if you wish to be included in the list and "Follow" if you wish to get a weekly update on how the firms score every week, the risers and fallers and relevant news about the community.

Leaderboard Page 2

Rank Law Firm Total Score
101. profile image Blakes 50.9
102. profile image Ince & Co 50.8
103. profile image Lewis Silkin 50.8
104. profile image Foley Hoag LLP 50.8
105. profile image PILPG 50.7
106. profile image MLex 50.7
107. profile image SCHR 50.7
108. profile image Penningtons Manches 50.6
109. profile image Burges Salmon 50.6
110. profile image Jackson Lewis P.C. 50.6
111. profile image Fragomen 50.6
112. profile image Shearman & Sterling 50.5
113. profile image Morton Fraser LLP 50.5
114. profile image Clarke Willmott LLP 50.5
115. profile image Fish & Richardson 50.4
116. profile image Haynes And Boone LLP 50.3
117. profile image Weil 50.3
118. profile image Pepper Hamilton LLP 50.3
119. profile image Baker Donelson 50.3
120. profile image Sidley Austin LLP 50.2
121. profile image Littler Mendelson 50.2
122. profile image Saul Ewing LLP 50.1
123. profile image DavisWrightTremaine 50.0
124. profile image Bristows LLP 50.0
125. profile image Simmons & Simmons 49.9
126. profile image Womble Carlyle 49.9
127. profile image Akin Gump 49.9
128. profile image Miller Thomson LLP 49.9
129. profile image ShakespeareMartineau 49.9
130. profile image Gibson Dunn 49.8
131. profile image Browne Jacobson LLP 49.8
132. profile image Epstein Becker Green 49.8
133. profile image Faegre Baker Daniels 49.8
134. profile image King & Spalding 49.7
135. profile image Barnes & Thornburg 49.7
136. profile image McGuireWoods LLP 49.7
137. profile image Locke Lord 49.7
138. profile image Thrings Solicitors 49.7
139. profile image Manatt 49.7
140. profile image Ballard Spahr LLP 49.6
141. profile image Vinson & Elkins 49.5
142. profile image SheppardMullin 49.5
143. profile image Stoel Rives LLP 49.4
144. profile image Crowell & Moring 49.3
145. profile image Lsn_team 49.3
146. profile image CMS Scotland 49.3
147. profile image Hill Dickinson LLP 49.2
148. profile image Blackadders 49.2
149. profile image Foley & Lardner LLP 49.2
150. profile image Bracewell 49.2
151. profile image Howes Percival 49.1
152. profile image KattenLaw 49.1
153. profile image Russell-Cooke LLP 49.1
154. profile image Wiley Rein 49.0
155. profile image Husch Blackwell 49.0
156. profile image Hughes Hubbard 48.9
157. profile image Digby Brown LLP 48.9
158. profile image Hodge Jones & Allen 48.9
159. profile image Deborah McMurray 48.8
160. profile image Howard Kennedy 48.8
161. profile image Gardere Wynne Sewell 48.8
162. profile image Alston & Bird LLP 48.8
163. profile image Birketts LLP 48.8
164. profile image Thompson Coburn LLP 48.8
165. profile image Knobbe Martens 48.7
166. profile image BLM 48.6
167. profile image Quarles & Brady LLP 48.6
168. profile image Gateley Plc 48.6
169. profile image Bass, Berry & Sims 48.5
170. profile image Burr & Forman LLP 48.5
171. profile image IR Global 48.1
172. profile image McDonald Hopkins LLC 48.1
173. profile image Torys LLP 47.9
174. profile image MinterEllison 47.9
175. profile image Gowling WLG 47.9
176. profile image Brownstein Hyatt 47.9
177. profile image Buchanan 47.8
178. profile image Nabarro 47.8
179. profile image VWV 47.7
180. profile image Wedlake Bell LLP 47.7
181. profile image DLA Piper Canada 47.6
182. profile image Goodmans LLP 47.6
183. profile image Clifford Chance NL 47.6
184. profile image Robinson+Cole 47.5
185. profile image ShoosmithsLaw 47.4
186. profile image GrayRobinson, P.a. 47.4
187. profile image Pillsburylaw 47.4
188. profile image Brabners LLP 47.4
189. profile image Debevoise & Plimpton 47.3
190. profile image Akerman Senterfitt 47.1
191. profile image Frost Brown Todd 47.1
192. profile image Arent Fox LLP 47.1
193. profile image Cordell & Cordell 47.0
194. profile image Snell & Wilmer 47.0
195. profile image Lindsays Solicitors 47.0
196. profile image Bevan Brittan LLP 46.9
197. profile image DMH Stallard 46.9
198. profile image Bradley 46.8
199. profile image Troutman Sanders 46.8
200. profile image MMS 46.8
  • Bulletin name:
    27 Apr 2017 update
  • Bulletin published at:
    9:00am - 27th Apr 2017
  • Score Period:
    20th Apr - 27th Apr 2017
  • Previous Bulletin name:
  • Previous Bulletin published at:
    11:44am - 20th Apr 2017
  • Data Sources: