Social Law Firms 13 Apr 2017 update

Collective goal

About

Top Social Law Firms is a free online success tracking service specifically for law firms all over the world.

You can use the service to track your firm's social influence score as measured by Klout, updated once a week. 

Why? So that you can see if you are improving your influence on social media then you are demonstrating your readiness for law in the digital 21st century.

Log In

By logging in you'll see your personal dashboard tracking your score over the past year.

Leaderboard

You can also see a "leaderboard" to see who are the the other leaders in your community.

Join

"Join" the list (link on the leaderboard page) with your Twitter account.  If you are a bona fide law firm,  you will be included in the list and your score will be published in the next release.

Follow

"Follow" the leaderboard (link on the leaderboard page) to receive an email update every time the board releases with new results (weekly)

Total Score: 0.0

Rise Social Media Social Law Firms Bulletins 13 Apr 2017 update

This Rise board lists Law Firms from all around the world that have a presence on Twitter and ranks them on their social media influence.

We use Klout scores as a measure of social media influence.

The board will update weekly on Thursdays.

Click on "Join" if you wish to be included in the list and "Follow" if you wish to get a weekly update on how the firms score every week, the risers and fallers and relevant news about the community.

Leaderboard Page 3

Rank Law Firm Total Score
201. profile image Gardere Wynne Sewell 46.8
202. profile image Baker Botts 46.8
203. profile image MMS 46.8
204. profile image HollandHart 46.8
205. profile image TLT TLT 46.8
206. profile image Troutman Sanders 46.7
207. profile image Lindsays Solicitors 46.7
208. profile image Cripps 46.7
209. profile image IR Global 46.6
210. profile image GrayRobinson, P.a. 46.6
211. profile image Aird & Berlis LLP 46.6
212. profile image Snell & Wilmer 46.5
213. profile image Gordons LLP 46.5
214. profile image Bircham Dyson Bell 46.5
215. profile image Dorsey & Whitney 46.5
216. profile image Bradley 46.3
217. profile image Hughes Hubbard 46.3
218. profile image Jenner & Block 46.3
219. profile image Travers Smith 46.3
220. profile image Turcan Connell 46.3
221. profile image Howie, Sacks & Henry 46.3
222. profile image Dawson Cornwell 46.1
223. profile image Loeb & Loeb LLP 46.1
224. profile image NMM 46.1
225. profile image Archer & Greiner 46.0
226. profile image Butler Snow LLP 46.0
227. profile image Minster Law 45.9
228. profile image Moore Blatch 45.8
229. profile image Brownstein Hyatt 45.8
230. profile image Hunton & Williams 45.7
231. profile image Dickinson Wright 45.7
232. profile image Kelley Drye & Warren 45.7
233. profile image Hinshaw & Culbertson 45.6
234. profile image Waller 45.6
235. profile image Goulston & Storrs 45.6
236. profile image William Olson 45.5
237. profile image Paul, Weiss, Rifkind 45.5
238. profile image Law Firm Marketing 45.5
239. profile image Gillespie Macandrew 45.5
240. profile image Cravath 45.4
241. profile image Schulte Roth & Zabel 45.4
242. profile image Basham 45.4
243. profile image Sterne Kessler 45.4
244. profile image Angela Wang & Co 45.4
245. profile image Sedgwick LLP 45.4
246. profile image Miller Canfield 45.3
247. profile image Watson Farley & Williams LLP 45.3
248. profile image Carlton Fields 45.3
249. profile image Vedder Price 45.2
250. profile image Cadwalader 45.2
251. profile image Dinsmore & Shohl 45.2
252. profile image Thompson Hine LLP 45.2
253. profile image HFW 45.1
254. profile image Keoghs Law 45.0
255. profile image Dykema 45.0
256. profile image Langleys Solicitors 45.0
257. profile image Stevens & Bolton 44.8
258. profile image DLA Piper Australia 44.8
259. profile image GreenwoodsSolicitors 44.8
260. profile image Benesch Law 44.7
261. profile image Beltrami & Co 44.7
262. profile image Flaster/Greenberg 44.7
263. profile image WeisbergKainenMark 44.6
264. profile image Forsters LLP 44.6
265. profile image HBJ Gateley 44.5
266. profile image Neves Solicitors LLP 44.5
267. profile image Morisons Solicitors 44.4
268. profile image BuckleySandler LLP 44.4
269. profile image DavisPolkReg 44.4
270. profile image Stites & Harbison 44.3
271. profile image Brinks Gilson 44.2
272. profile image Wierzbowski Eversheds Sutherland 44.2
273. profile image Balfour+Manson LLP 44.1
274. profile image StewartsLawLLP 44.0
275. profile image Winthrop & Weinstine 43.9
276. profile image Jackson Walker 43.9
277. profile image Vorys 43.8
278. profile image Fenwick Elliott LLP 43.7
279. profile image Miller & Martin PLLC 43.6
280. profile image Jaburg|Wilk 43.6
281. profile image Farrer & Co 43.6
282. profile image Clifford Law 43.5
283. profile image WINSTEAD PC 43.5
284. profile image Schiff Hardin LLP 43.5
285. profile image Day Pitney LLP 43.4
286. profile image Stephenson Harwood 43.4
287. profile image LaPolt Law 43.4
288. profile image Gibbons P.C. 43.3
289. profile image Burg Simpson 43.3
290. profile image Davies 43.2
291. profile image Macfarlanes LLP 43.1
292. profile image Fried Frank 43.0
293. profile image Infrastructure Law 42.7
294. profile image Baker & McKenzie MX 42.7
295. profile image Fladgate LLP 42.7
296. profile image Schnader Harrison 42.6
297. profile image Boodle Hatfield LLP 42.4
298. profile image Miller Hendry 42.4
299. profile image Wright Law Offices 42.1
300. profile image Burford 42.0
  • Bulletin name:
    13 Apr 2017 update
  • Bulletin published at:
    7:52am - 13th Apr 2017
  • Score Period:
    6th Apr - 13th Apr 2017
  • Previous Bulletin name:
  • Previous Bulletin published at:
    9:00am - 6th Apr 2017
  • Data Sources: