Social Law Firms 19 Jan 2017 update

Collective goal

About

Top Social Law Firms is a free online success tracking service specifically for law firms all over the world.

You can use the service to track your firm's social influence score as measured by Klout, updated once a week. 

Why? So that you can see if you are improving your influence on social media then you are demonstrating your readiness for law in the digital 21st century.

Log In

By logging in you'll see your personal dashboard tracking your score over the past year.

Leaderboard

You can also see a "leaderboard" to see who are the the other leaders in your community.

Join

"Join" the list (link on the leaderboard page) with your Twitter account.  If you are a bona fide law firm,  you will be included in the list and your score will be published in the next release.

Follow

"Follow" the leaderboard (link on the leaderboard page) to receive an email update every time the board releases with new results (weekly)

Total Score: 0.0

Rise Social Media Social Law Firms Bulletins 19 Jan 2017 update

This Rise board lists Law Firms from all around the world that have a presence on Twitter and ranks them on their social media influence.

We use Klout scores as a measure of social media influence.

The board will update weekly on Thursdays.

Click on "Join" if you wish to be included in the list and "Follow" if you wish to get a weekly update on how the firms score every week, the risers and fallers and relevant news about the community.

Leaderboard Page 3

Rank Law Firm Total Score
201. profile image HFW 46.0
202. profile image Bracewell 46.0
203. profile image Snell & Wilmer 45.9
204. profile image Hinshaw & Culbertson 45.9
205. profile image Withersworldwide 45.8
206. profile image Gillespie Macandrew 45.7
207. profile image Cripps 45.7
208. profile image Fragomen 45.7
209. profile image DavisPolkReg 45.7
210. profile image Brabners LLP 45.7
211. profile image Anderson Strathern 45.6
212. profile image Bradley 45.6
213. profile image Fieldfisher 45.6
214. profile image McDonald Hopkins LLC 45.5
215. profile image Miller Canfield 45.5
216. profile image Kramer Levin 45.5
217. profile image Langleys Solicitors 45.4
218. profile image Law Firm Marketing 45.4
219. profile image Goodmans LLP 45.4
220. profile image Lowenstein Sandler 45.4
221. profile image Torys LLP 45.3
222. profile image Archer & Greiner 45.3
223. profile image Basham 45.3
224. profile image Gordons LLP 45.2
225. profile image Carlton Fields 45.2
226. profile image McCarter English 45.2
227. profile image Stephenson Harwood 45.0
228. profile image Winckworth Sherwood 45.0
229. profile image Dykema 45.0
230. profile image DMH Stallard 44.9
231. profile image Travers Smith 44.9
232. profile image Howie, Sacks & Henry 44.9
233. profile image KWM EMEA 44.8
234. profile image NMM 44.8
235. profile image Kaye Scholer 44.8
236. profile image Kelley Drye & Warren 44.8
237. profile image Cravath 44.7
238. profile image Benesch Law 44.7
239. profile image Brownstein Hyatt 44.7
240. profile image WeisbergKainenMark 44.7
241. profile image Jackson Walker 44.6
242. profile image MMS 44.5
243. profile image GrayRobinson, P.a. 44.4
244. profile image DLA Piper Australia 44.3
245. profile image Davies 44.3
246. profile image Moore Blatch 44.3
247. profile image Clifford Law 44.3
248. profile image Schulte Roth & Zabel 44.2
249. profile image Arent Fox LLP 44.2
250. profile image BuckleySandler LLP 44.2
251. profile image DLA Piper Canada 44.1
252. profile image Morisons Solicitors 44.0
253. profile image Burg Simpson 44.0
254. profile image Minster Law 43.9
255. profile image IM Business 43.8
256. profile image Flaster/Greenberg 43.8
257. profile image Fladgate LLP 43.8
258. profile image Frost Brown Todd 43.8
259. profile image Dickinson Wright 43.7
260. profile image Vorys 43.7
261. profile image Neves Solicitors LLP 43.7
262. profile image Keoghs Law 43.6
263. profile image Hunton & Williams 43.6
264. profile image Lerner And Rowe 43.5
265. profile image Boodle Hatfield LLP 43.5
266. profile image Hughes Hubbard 43.5
267. profile image Fried Frank 43.5
268. profile image Fenwick Elliott LLP 43.4
269. profile image Brinks Gilson 43.3
270. profile image Waller 43.3
271. profile image Thompson Hine LLP 43.1
272. profile image Stevens & Bolton 43.0
273. profile image Jaburg|Wilk 43.0
274. profile image Dinsmore & Shohl 42.9
275. profile image Gordon & Rees 42.9
276. profile image Winthrop & Weinstine 42.9
277. profile image HBJ Gateley 42.8
278. profile image Paul, Weiss, Rifkind 42.7
279. profile image Lindquist & Vennum 42.7
280. profile image GreenwoodsSolicitors 42.7
281. profile image Turcan Connell 42.6
282. profile image Macfarlanes LLP 42.6
283. profile image Burford 42.6
284. profile image Goldberg & Osborne 42.5
285. profile image Stites & Harbison 42.5
286. profile image Burns & Levinson LLP 42.4
287. profile image KattenLaw 42.3
288. profile image Miller & Martin PLLC 42.3
289. profile image Reminger Co., L.P.a. 42.3
290. profile image Baker & McKenzie MX 42.2
291. profile image WINSTEAD PC 42.2
292. profile image Sedgwick LLP 42.2
293. profile image Sterne Kessler 42.0
294. profile image CRS_Family 42.0
295. profile image Schiff Hardin LLP 41.9
296. profile image Farrer & Co 41.8
297. profile image Pullman & Comley 41.8
298. profile image Day Pitney LLP 41.8
299. profile image Willkie 41.8
300. profile image Chadbourne & Parke 41.7
  • Bulletin name:
    19 Jan 2017 update
  • Bulletin published at:
    3:26pm - 19th Jan 2017
  • Score Period:
    12th Jan - 19th Jan 2017
  • Previous Bulletin name:
  • Previous Bulletin published at:
    8:00am - 12th Jan 2017
  • Data Sources: